A Patient Perpective: Focusin On Compensating Harm – Article Example

Tort Law and Medical Malpractice Tort Law and Medical Malpractice Brief Summary The article is inclined towards assessing safeguarding patients from medical malpractices. Many individuals take health insurance to cover for any complications that may occur, which has essentially made the insurers a pivotal pillar in the provision of care. Insurers have consequently brought economics to health care in a way that its provision can result in either desirable or undesirable economic outcomes. On a bright side, the tort system has for some time been in use to ensure that medical practitioners solely act in the best interest of their patients. However, there have been numerous arguments the tort system particularly citing that it fosters medical malpractice; the complete opposite of what it is supposed to do (Witmer, 2004).
The collective use of insurance to cover medical expenses has made them very influential to the provision of care, too much that they have made it more about economics rather than care. Their efforts to point a finger at the tort system for medical malpractice has amassed some interest from stakeholders, but only a few are aware of the underlying factors like the ones highlighted in this article. Although the insurers are keenly following the developments in the health care, very few are checking on the developments in the insurance sector. Witmer (2004) identifies underlying factors that contribute to the malpractices in the medical sphere, and that are not related to the tort system (p. 590-9). Doing away with the tort system as the insurers prefer would leave patients very vulnerable to economic exploitation. It would also be uninformed since it does not solve the problem, yet initiates a dire one (Kilgore, 2006, p 255-6).
Kilgore, M. L. (2006). Tort Law and Medical Malpractice Insurance Premiums. Inquiry,
13(2), 255-260.
Witmer, V. (2004). A Patient Perspective: Focusing on Compensating Harm. Ann Health
Law, 43(3), 589-600.