Cyper Ethics – Article Example
Internet usage Internet usage Lawrence Lessig, a computer and internet activist, argues that charging content providers different prices for the same data is wrong. He perceives such a system as unfair because it gives leverage to the larger companies, which can purchase faster internet at high prices. On the other hand, smaller companies are restricted to slower data because of their relative limited capital. This compromises on the function of the internet as an innovation tool.
Powell poses four sets of freedom that the internet should allow. To begin with, there is the freedom to access content as depending on individuals’ choices of data and speed. The freedom to use applications allows consumers to use software of choice while using the internet. This allows application developers to flourish without restraint. In addition, there is the freedom to attach personal devices in their homes because such devices grant consumers more value and choice. In addition, consumers share the right to acquire meaningful information concerning given service plans. Bennett argues that net neutrality is impossible and pretentious because it ignores the internet’s inherent inequality (Bennett, 2014). Net neutrality also inhibits competition from content providers who have a great capacity towards offering more value.
Yoo argues that broadband providers should share the entitlement to charge different prices to content providers. This will inspire a fast internet system, as consumers access data promptly than the previous years. Yoo mentions of online services such as online phone calls that demand higher amount of bandwidth. Charging similar prices for such services could be, therefore, a disincentivizing factor to service providers.
Bennett, R. (2014). Time to give up the net-neutrality quest. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303519404579354801141804482.