AED WK 8 DQ 2 – Coursework Example
Systematic behavior management al affiliation Systematic behavior management In the first scenario, the level of management being handled by Mr. Brunk is inclusive behavior management. This practice is evident when realizes that Carter’s problem is chronic since the class’ management plan’s consequences are not thorough enough to alter and correct Carter’s behavior. Even with the most suitable plan and operations for the opening inclusive level, this level of behavioral management and Carter can be able to provide feedback on any progress made while in class. Students with chronic and maintained levels of issue actions will need more intensive and aimed intercessions and maintenance (Rosenberg, Westling & Cleskey, 2007, p. 203). Normally, these aimed minor intercessions need dedicated educational advancements and adjustments together with personally tailored behavior-altered creativities, as well as communal skills instruction, self-monitoring, and the tutoring of suitable replacement behaviors. Intercessions at such a level of behavioral management are ranked at the third tier of the model. This makes it the most suitable for Carter because his behaviors are critically engaged, regularly antisocial, and highly tricky to adopt to change. Mrs. Wright is not solely able to handle Carter. This is another element of behavioral management in such a situation because of its engagement in the factors that led Mr. Brunk to take Carter to Mrs. Wright (Rosenberg, Westling & Cleskey, 2007, p. 211).
In scenario two, the level of management of behavior being managed is a joint wraparound. This is evident when the classroom teachers, consolers, the assistant principal and other specialists come together to figure out the best solution through an intervention (Rosenberg, Westling & Cleskey, 2007, p. 91). The joint wraparound involves an interagency cooperation at the core of the intercessions made for Monica. A major objective made for Monica has the aim of linking pupils with their families, alongside the suitable socially-oriented interventions. In scenario three, the level of behavioral management portrayed by the tutor is the organization and effective instruction. Mrs. Brooks is well-organized and this creates highly little chance that seemingly trivial matters could arise. As an effectual immediate consequence, Mrs. Brooks made models for speaking in close proximity, morning gathering and the provision of calm cautions (Rosenberg, Westling & Cleskey, 2007, p. 99). Even though these instructions are overlooked by Michael, this serves as a second factor involved with this level of behavioral management with children.
Rosenberg, R. S., Westling, D. L. and Cleskey, J. M. (2007). Special Education for Today’s Teachers: An Introduction. New York: Prentice Hall.