No Topic – Coursework Example

The proposer to cultural relativism argues that there is no measure of right or wrong in over what is found in each society. It is based on the argument different societies have different moral codes and there is no objective standard. Further, the proposers of this movement argue it is arrogant to judge. While the Greeks claim it is not right to eat the dead, the Callatians will say it is right to eat the dead. The basic premise is that different cultures have different morals. According to the premise of cultural relativism, it is reasonable to argue there is no objective truth in morality. Right or wrong is just a matter of opinion depending on the culture in question.
The conclusion, however, does not always follow the premise. It means, despite the fact that cultural relativism argues that there is no absolute truth, in a matter of fact there is some absolute truth in everything. Using the previous case of the Greeks and Callatians about whether it is right to eat the dead, it is possible to dissect where the truth lies between these two statements. It may be unhealthy to eat human dead body to avoid the spread of diseases and that would undisputed truth.
For instance, we can use science to ascertain the absolute truth. A classic example is the how some people believe that the earth is round, and other believes it is flat. It would be hard just to conclude all of them are right. The modern technology has proven without any reasonable doubts that the earth is round. Therefore, despite the various opinions held be different people, there is some absolute truth.
One consequence of cultural relativism is that we cannot afford to argue that other cultures are inferior since it would be right and just in their sense.
In conclusion, just because people may disagree over some issues, this does not translate that there is no absolute truth or wrong on about the issues in questions. It just proves that people disagree.