U5 Discussion – Coursework Example

U5 Discussion U5 Discussion One pro of WSB (Windows Server Backup) is that it is network attached and excellent for sharing space amongst computers and simple metal restorations. A second pro is having a low maintenance cost. Thirdly, WSB is suitable for small surroundings, which can include small enterprises with a single server. One con is the lack of centralized management. WSB also lacks coarse restoration for services such as Exchange. A third con is the lack of tape drive support, which small enterprises still use today (Wallen, 2012).
I would use WSB in a small business setting because of its economic maintenance cost and ability to restore simple metal data. I would also use WSB for personal use when big data is needed for restoration of files rather than entire systems. For small businesses that do not need full system backups, WSB is fitting for particular data file restorations when not in production. I would choose a different backup solution such as CrashPlan when I need to backup data, along with their permissions, and full systems while offline (Wallen, 2012). WSB requires the internet for backup and restoration protocols, which makes it unsuitable for offline restorations. In addition, when even minimal data loss is unacceptable, choosing another backup utility other than WSB is commendable.
One different option for backing up Windows Server 2008 is Windows Server 2008 R2, which is better than WSB because it is a one-step structure for securing data on a server and network (Wallen, 2012). Another option is Acronis Backup and Restore (with Universal Restore) because of its ability to guarantee space on external HDDs for the most recent backups. Lastly, Symantec Backup Exec because of its usage of SSL for all system backup links (Wallen, 2012).
References
Wallen, J. (2012). Five reliable Windows Server backup solutions. TechRepublic. Retrieved from http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/five-apps/five-reliable-windows-server-backup- solutions/