HCI Reading Journal- HCI Reading Journal- Peer Review #2 – Research Paper Example
HCI Reading Journal- HCI Reading Journal- Peer Review #2 Number; Lecturer; HCI Reading Journal- HCI Reading Journal- Peer Review #2
Kent Nardins observations are quite true and interesting to some extent. First, I relate with some of his observations and agree with them. His first observation is quite true; I am also a victim of the sudden change in the design of windows operating system. When windows 8 was released, I couldn’t wait to get it running in my machine. I dint even bother to search for a clue of the changes that comes with the new operating system. Once I installed it in my laptop I regretted ever upgrading to windows 8. First, it’s too cumbersome you would think you are using a totally new operating system. That was one of the worst human computer interface design that not only overburdened the user with endless steps to achieve the simplest tasks but also a let down to the user expectations from a reputable organization.
In his second observation Kent Nardins points out one of the major concerns that I believe is shared by all students taking this class. In response to his observation, I think the school should consider introducing the unit in the design class to ensure that students achieve the best and required experience in the design class. It is important to note that this eventually affect their performance in their future career endeavors.
Heim (2008) opines that the effectiveness of an interface is the ease of use and the efficiency in performing the intended tasks. The design of Eclipse IDE and many more IDEs seem to omit this concept. Most of them require a great deal of study and mastery of the interface before using it. I tend to believe that this is so because this was intended for IT savvyusers who inturn use it to develop simpler interfaces for other users.
Heim, S. (2008). The resonant interface: HCI foundations for interaction design. Boston: Pearson.